Jury Instructions (Judge Bennett)
This section of the web site allows you to access selected jury instructions. The instructions are organized by categories listed on the lower left portion of this page. If you would like to do a word search of the entire database or individual categories you may do so by clicking on the search button below.




JudgeCan be sorted ascendingCase TypeDate FiledCase Name
Hide details for Mark W. BennettMark W. Bennett
Hide details for CivilCivil
03/13/2014Jay Clasing & Deanna Clasing d/b/a Jade Farms v. Hormel Foods Corporation (Suit by hog finishers against a meat packing company for breach of an oral contract for continued purchases of Candadian-born (Category B) hogs.
01/23/2014Security National Bank, as Conservator for JMK, a minor child v. Abott Laboratories (product defect claims against defendant, the manufacturer of the Similac Neosure powdered infant formula (PIF) that the plaintiff alleges was the source of the bacterial infection that caused JMK’s permanent physical and mental injuries. More specifically, claims of design defect, a manufacturing defect, and a warning defect in the Similac Neosure PIF.)
12/16/2013Peters v. Risdal, et al. (Claims that the Defendant Officers violated Plaintiff's constitutional rights to be free from the use of “excessive force” by law enforcement officers and to be free from “retaliation” by law enforcement officers for exercising free speech rights.).
05/01/2013Hagen v. Siouxland Obstetrics & Gynecology, et al. (wrongful discharge - public policy - instructions show with strike outs portions withdrawn from the jury's consideration))
11/16/2012EAD Control Systems, LLC v. Besser Company USA (EAD and Besser entered into a contract for EAD to produce a controls system for operating robotic cranes at a pipe-producing facility that Besser was constructing. EAD alleged that Besser had not paid EAD in full for the work that EAD performed pursuant to the contract. Besser alleged that EAD failed to perform in accordance with the contract.)
10/02/2012Gene Luken v. Tina Marie Edwards
04/11/2012Gilster v. Primebank, et al. (Claims of sexual harassment and retaliation for complaining about sexual harassment in violation of federal and Iowa law.)
11/07/2011Shannon v. Koehler (Excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution)
08/22/2011Maxim v. Dental Care, Scott Thompson, & Rod Stewart (Breach of contract and discharge in violation of public policy claims).
04/01/2011State of Arizona Department of Law, Civil Rights Division & Aguilar v. ASARCO LLC (sexual harrasment/retaliation/constructive discharge)
11/09/2009Bodeans Cone Co. , LLC v. Norse Dairy Sys., LLC (Antitrust action for injunctive relief and damages by one maker of novelty cones and ice cream sandwich wafers against another maker: Court’s final version of Jury Instructions, prepared before trial, on claims of monopolization, attempt to monopolize, exclusive dealing, and tying. Case settled prior to trial.)
11/04/2009Bodeans Cone Co., LLC v. Norse Dairy Sys., LLC (Antitrust action for injunctive relief and damages by one maker of novelty cones and ice cream sandwich wafers against another maker: Court’s final version of Glossary of Antitrust Terminology to accompany Jury Instructions, prepared before trial, on claims of monopolization, attempt to monopolize, exclusive dealing, and tying. Case settled prior to trial.)
03/05/2009Ronald Kuiper & Conley Kuiper v. Givaudan Flavors Corp. ( Claims for a lung injury to Ronald Kuiper allegedly caused by inhaling fumes from butter flavorings made by Givaudan that were used by Kuiper’s employer, American Pop Corn Company, to make microwave popcorn. Claims include: defective designe; failure to provide adequate warnings; and failure to test the butter flavorings for hazardous health effects when they were used in foreseeable ways. Damages: the lung injury to Ronald Kuiper and the injury to his relationship with his wife, Conley Kuiper, allegedly caused by Givaudan’s defective design, failure to warn, and failure to test.)
03/05/2009Ronald Kuiper & Conley Kuiper v. Givaudan Flavors Corp. (Supplemental Jury Instructions)
02/02/2009Transamerica Life Insurance, et al. v. Lincoln National Life Insurance (Patent Infringement)
05/16/2007Raymond v. U.S.A. Healthcare Center -- Fort Dodge, LLC, et al. (Allegations of termination in violation of Iowa law, because plaintiff filed a workers’ compensation claim for a wrist injury that she suffered on the job. Plaintiff sought damages for the defendants’ allegedly retaliatory conduct.
The defendants denied the claim and contended that they lawfully terminated plaintiff's employment.)
12/13/2006Davidson v. Kinseth Hospitality Corp., et al. (Plaintiff claimed that, from shortly after she was hired until she was terminated, she was subjected to sexual harassment by a supervisor, sexual discrimination in the form of different treatment and pay when compared to similarly-situated male employees, and retaliation for opposing sex discrimination in the work place. She also contended that she was eventually terminated as a result of harassment and discrimination because of her sex and in retaliation for her complaints about sexual discrimination. Plaintiff sought damages for the defendants’ alleged wrongful conduct.
11/10/2005Bunda v. Potter (Plaintiff claims that, she was subjected to hostile work environment sexual harassment and that she was retaliated against for making one or more complaints to a supervisor about this alleged sexual harassment. Ms. Bunda seek damages for sexual harassment and retaliation. The Post Office denies Ms. Bunda’s claims.
11/04/2005Anita Lopez & Maricela Villalpando v. Aramark Uniform Career Apparel, Inc. (Plaintiffs contend that, during their employment, they were subjected to hostile environment sexual harassment and quid pro quo sexual harassment by their supervisor, and retaliation by ARAMARK for complaining about sexual harassment. Ms. Lopez contends that ARAMARK terminated her employment as part of the sexual harassment and retaliation, and Ms. Villalpando contends that ARAMARK constructively discharged her, or forced to quit her job, by allowing the supervisor to sexually harass her and by retaliating against her for complaining about sexual harassment. The plaintiffs seek damages for sexual harassment and retaliation, including damages for loss of employment.
ARAMARK denies each plaintiff’s claims. ARAMARK asserts that no sexual harassment or retaliation occurred, that Ms. Lopez was terminated for absenteeism, and that Ms. Villalpando simply quit her job at ARAMARK without informing ARAMARK of any problems or giving ARAMARK any opportunity to work out any problems.)
01/10/2005Tinius v. St. Anthony Regional Hospital, Inc., et al. (Claims arising from an incident at St. Anthony Regional Hospital in Carroll, Iowa, during which plaintiff contends that he was unlawfully confined against his will and was catheterized without his consent. Plaintiff asserts claims of false imprisonment, medical battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, and negligence.)
05/11/2004Engineered Products v. Donaldson Co. (Patent infringement)
02/19/2004Sherman, et al. v. Kasotakis (Plaintiffs assert claims of “racial discrimination in services of a public restaurant.”
More specifically, the plaintiffs, all African Americans, allege that, on or about June 23, 2001, they entered The Horizons Family Restaurant to get something to eat. However, they allege that a server refused to allow them to be seated in a certain section, because of their race, and referred to them in racially insensitive terms. They allege that the host then reseated them in another section of the restaurant, which they noticed was the place where all persons of color had been seated, while white customers were seated in other areas of the restaurant. They allege that their treatment at The Horizons Family Restaurant violated federal law, because it deprived them of the same right to contract for the services of the restaurant as is enjoyed by white citizens.
10/15/2003Coupland v. Team Ford (Suit alleging disparate treatment based on sex in violation of Title VII and the ICRA; plaintiff alleged that Team Ford subjected her to higher work standards than those imposed on male salespersons and then terminated her employment on October 27, 2000, which Team Ford denied, asserting instead that it had legitimate business reasons for terminating Ms. Coupland’s employment.)
02/25/2003Knutson v. AG Processing, Inc.(Suit brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA, which, among other things, makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate intentionally against an employee because the employer regards or perceives the employee to be disabled. A claim based on this part of the ADA is called a "perceived disability discrimination claim." Plaintiff alleges that he was discharged from his employment because Defendant perceived him to be disabled, even though he is not actually disabled within the meaning of the ADA. Defendant, however, contends that it did not perceive Plaintiff to be disabled, but instead discharged him for videotaping the inside of the Defendant's facility at Eagle Grove, Iowa, where he was employed, without permission.
12/06/2002Wensel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Title VII employment discrimination case; plaintiff alleges pregnancy discrimination through defendant’s failure to award her an independent insurance agency contract when her training period was extended two times)
10/01/2002Baker v. John Morrell Co. (Sexually hostile work environment and disparate treatment claims under Title VII for predominantly co-worker harassment, retaliation claim, and constructive discharge claim)
07/19/2002Bergdale v. Uni-Select, USA, Inc. (Case brought by plaintiff Maria Bergdale against her former employer defendant Uni-Select USA, Inc., in which Ms. Bergdale alleges claims of discrimination and retaliation arising from her employment and termination. Uni-Select denies Ms. Bergdale’s claims.
Plaintiff asserts the following claims against Uni-Select: (1) discrimination on the basis of her disability, her record of having a disability, or Uni-Select’s perception that she is disabled; (2) discrimination because of her age; (3) retaliation for filing a charge of discrimination; and (4) retaliation for filing workers compensation claims. She seeks an award of compensatory and punitive damages against Uni-Select.
Uni-Select, however, denies that Ms. Bergdale was terminated, maintains that it had legitimate business reasons for the decisions that it made, and denies that it discriminated or retaliated against Ms. Bergdale. Uni-Select also denies that Ms. Bergdale is entitled to recover either compensatory or punitive damages on her claims.
06/06/2002Erickson-Puttmann v. Woodbury County (Civil action brought by plaintiff Patty Erickson-Puttmann against defendant Woodbury County, Iowa. Erickson-Puttmann alleges that she was sexually harassed in her work place by an elected official in another department of County government, the Woodbury County Auditor and Recorder. Erickson-Puttmann alleges that she brought the harassment to the attention of members of the Woodbury County Board of Supervisors on a number of occasions, but that the Board failed to take steps reasonably calculated to stop the harassment. She seeks an award of damages for emotional distress. Although the County admits that Erickson-Puttmann complained to Board members about harassment, the County denied that it failed to take appropriate remedial action.
05/23/2002Busch v. City of Anthon, et al. (This case involves various claims arising out of a series of disputes between the Busches and the City and County Defendants in 1998, which revolve around Jackie Busch’s membership on and eventual removal from the Anthon Public Library Board.
First, plaintiffs asserts a claim of "assault and battery" against Ron Houghtaling arising from a confrontation outside of the Public Library on or about April 26, 1998.
Next, plaintiffs allege a claim of "invasion of privacy" against Doug Boetger arising from an incident on or about May 5, 1998, during which plaintiff alleges that, while purportedly investigating a complaint that she had "harassed" the Mayor of the City of Anthon, Doug Boetger demanded to know who her therapists were and what medications she was taking, and looked through her prescription containers. Plainitff asserts several claims arising from another confrontation over her supposed refusal to pay for $2.20 worth of photocopies at the Public Library on or about May 26, 1998. This incident gives rise to another claim of "assault and battery," this time against Ruth Groth. In addition, the photocopying incident on May 26, 1998, gives rise to plainitffs' claims against Helen Pulliam and Ruth Groth for "malicious prosecution" "which is prosecution when there is no probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed"and "abuse of process" "which is use of a criminal charge primarily for an improper purpose, such as harassment or intimidation. This incident also gives rise to plaintiffs' first claim of "false arrest and imprisonment" "that is, arrest with no probable cause to believe that a crime had been committed. In that claim, plaintiff alleges that she was falsely arrested by Christine Garthright and Gregory Logan on or about May 26, 1998, during the incident involving payment for photocopies, and that Ruth Groth and Helen Pulliam instigated that false arrest.
Finally, Plaintiff asserts another "false arrest and imprisonment" claim, this one against Angie Jorgenson, based on Jackie Busch’s arrest for harassment and tampering with a motor vehicle on a warrant allegedly requested by Angie Jorgenson, without probable cause, after an incident at a gas station on or about November 21, 1998, in which Plaintiff’s motor vehicle bumped into a motor vehicle owned by Lincoln Umbach.
The Plaintiffs' allege that, as a result of the wrongful conduct of the defendants, they are entitled to recover actual and punitive damages. However, the City and County Defendants deny all of the Plaintiffs’ claims or that the Plaintiffs suffered any damages as the result of any of the incidents alleged.
01/09/2002Cruz, et al. v. Prosser, et al. (Action against defendants Mark A. Prosser and Todd Erskine, individually and in their official capacities as officers of the Storm Lake Police Department, and the City of Storm Lake, Iowa. Plaintiffs allege violation of their civil rights arising from the response of the Storm Lake Police to a call for assistance at the Plaintiffs' residence.
09/21/2001Mutual Service Casualty Co. v. Armbrecht (Plaintiff as "subrogee" of Land O'Lakes filed suit for breach of contract which the Plaintiff contends caused litigation between Land O'Lakes and a third party]
07/11/2001Asa-Brandt, et al. v. Farmer's Co-op (Hedge-to-arrive contract dispute for the sale and purchase of grain; repudiation and breach; breach of fiduciary duty)
04/04/2001Top of Iowa v. Schewe (Hedge-to-arrive contract dispute for the sale and purchase of grain; repudiation and breach; breach of fiduciary duty)
11/17/2000Mercer v. City of Cedar Rapids, et al. (Slander claim arising from certain statements by the defendant chief of police to a newspaper concerning the discharge of the plaintiff probationary police officer; slander of a "public figure" or "public official" requiring proof of "actual malice"; slander per se or slander; affirmative defense of "truth")
08/18/2000Dethmers Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Automatic Equipment Manufacturing Company (Intellectual property; claims of breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and unjust enrichment arising from defendant's alleged use of plaintiff's assignor's idea or invention for a tow bar without compensating him for it)
02/25/2000Kuchenreuther v. AG Processing (Employment law; sexual harassment; hostile environment by co-workers and supervisor; equal pay act claim)
02/17/2000Webner v. Titan Distribution, Inc. (Employment law, ADA and state law retaliation; disability discrimination; retaliation for pursuing a workers' compensation claim)
02/02/2000Prine v. Sioux City Community School District (Title VII sexual harassment; hostile work environment; sex discrimination claim)
12/10/1999Longstreth v. Copple, et al. (Case settled first day of trial; FMLA notice and termination)
11/22/1999Tompkins v. Northwest Iowa Hospital, et al (Medical malpractice)
10/08/1999Rooney v. Kautzky, et al. (Civil rights: deliberate indifference to serious medical needs)
05/01/1999Larson v. Farmers Cooperative (Hedge to arrive; breach of contract case)
12/31/1998McLarty v. Woodbury County (ADEA: failure to hire)
11/17/1998Ogden v. Wax Works (Title VII sexual harassment: hostile environment, quid pro quo harassment, retaliation)
10/13/1998Christenson v. City of Mason City (Civil rights: arrest without probable cause, excessive use of force, municipal liability, failure to train or supervise
09/10/1998Johnson v. Land O' Lakes (Hedge-to-arrive contract case: breach of contract; counterclaims: breach of contract, equitable estoppel, unjust enrichment)
05/01/1998Mun Phan v. Trinity Regional (Title VII race discrimination: failure to promote, retaliation, constructive discharge)
02/03/1998Ahrens v. Golden Sun Feeds (ADA: discriminatory discharge, undue hardship defense, retaliation)
09/11/1997 Munz v. City of Mason City (Civil rights: excessive use of force, concerted activity)
Hide details for CriminalCriminal
07/08/2014U.S. v. Joseph Tyler McDonald (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine)
03/06/2014U.S. v. Ricardo Limon-Urenda (Conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine)
02/10/2014U.S. v. Michael Clayton (bank robbery)
11/06/2013U.S. v. Darran Lohse (Use of a child under the age of 18 to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing child pornography; knowingly receiving a video or videos of child pornography; knowingly possessing a video or videos of child pornography) (Unannotated and Annotated version so the Jury Instructions are attached)
09/11/2013U.S. v. Jeffery Thompson (Conspiring with others to distribute 280 grams or more of crack cocaine; distributing an unspecified amount of crack cocaine; distributing an unspecified amount of crack cocaine.)
06/19/2013U.S. v. Paige Mathison (conspiring with others to commit a robbery that would obstruct, delay, or affect commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce; aiding and abetting a robbery that obstructed, delayed, or affected commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce; possessing or aiding and abetting the possession of a firearm, in furtherance of a robbery; receiving and possessing or aiding and abetting receiving and possessing a firearm, that was not registered to her in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record.)
10/26/2012U.S. v. Javier Torres (Conspiracy to distribute methampetamine)
09/24/2012U.S. v. Jaime Almazan (Sexual Exploitation of a Child)
06/19/2012U.S. v. Gutknecht (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine)
06/12/2012U.S. v. Jesus Quintero-Felix (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine) (supplemental instruction)
06/01/2012U.S. v. Angel & Javier Amaya (Drug conspiracy and money laundering -- Includes supplemental instruction to the jury on single or multiple conspiracies)
05/09/2012U.S. v. Jeromy Joseph Ackerman (felon in possession)
04/02/2012U.S. v. Sandra Garcia De Alvarez (Conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine)
02/29/2012U.S. v. Hulstein (five offenses allegedly arising from dealing firearms without a license and one offense of making a false claim for property damage against the United States.)
11/15/2011U.S. v. Darwin Zoch (felon in possession of firearms and ammunition)
08/24/2011U.S. v. Wei Lin (Document fraud and making a false statement to a federal agent.)
04/19/2011U.S. v. Shawn Krug (Felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition)
02/09/2011U.S. v. Allen Williams & Robert McNairy (both defendants unlawfully conspired to distribute crack cocaine; defendant Williams knowingly and intentionally distributed crack cocaine; both defendants knowingly and intentionally distributed and aided and abetted each other and others to distribute crack cocaine; defendant McNairy distributed and aided and abetted another to distribute crack cocaine within 1,000 feet of a playground or school; at separate times, defendant Williams knowingly and intentionally distributed crack cocaine.)
10/27/2010U.S. v. Michael Mayer (Persuading, inducing, and enticing a child under the age of 18 to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing visual depictions of such conduct; Causing those visual depictions to be produced using material, namely, an LG cell phone, that had been shipped and transported across state or international borders, that he knew or had reason to know that those visual depictions would be transported across state or international borders, and that those visual depictions were actually transported across state or international borders.)
08/23/2010U.S. v. Jose Luis Rodriguez-Ramos & German Expectacion Robles-Garcia (Conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine; Kidnapping)
07/29/2010U.S. v. William Junior Rock (Failure to register as a sex offender)
07/07/2010U.S. v. Kevin Wayne Moes (Failure to register as a sex offender.)
05/28/2010U.S. v. Peter Hanson (Conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute marijuana -- Includes supplemental instruction)
02/25/2010U.S. v. Jameco Bell (Conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute marijuana)
02/25/2010U.S. v. Jameco Bell (Supplemental Instruction to the Jury)
01/12/2010U.S. v. Michael Steven Speece (Conspiracy to commit four offenses: (1) distributing 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; (2) possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; (3) distributing 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine; and (4) possessing with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine -- all within 1,000 feet of a playground or school)
11/03/2009U.S. v. Lance Miller (Knowingly receiving or attempting to receive a visual depiction of child pornography that had been transported in interstate or foreign commerce; knowingly possessing or attempting to possess a visual depiction of child pornography that had been produced using a Seagate hard drive (from a Compaq Presario computer) that was manufactured outside the state of Iowa; knowingly possessing or attempting to possess visual depictions of child pornography that had been produced using a Seagate hard drive (from an HP Pavilion computer) that was manufactured outside the state of Iowa.)
10/29/2009U.S. v. Kendrick Butler (Knowingly executing and attempting to execute a scheme to defraud financial institutions and to obtain the moneys, funds, assets, and other property owned by, and under the custody and control of, financial institutions by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises.)
03/24/2009U.S. v. Jermaine Bryson (Knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute approximately 8.23 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine).
01/08/2009U.S. v. Robert Miell (Willfully filing a false tax return based on failure to declare as income funds received from American Family Insurance (AFI) for insurance coverage for hail damage to roofs of rental properties owned by Miell; Willfully filed a false tax return based on failure to declare as income funds received from AFI for insurance coverage for hail damage to roofs of rental properties owned by Miell)
11/05/2008U.S. v. Worman (Knowingly depositing and causing to be deposited at the Post Office, for mailing and delivery, a stamped and addressed package containing an explosive, inflammable material, an infernal machine, a device which may ignite or explode, and material which may kill or injure another, which constitutes non-mailable matter, with intent to kill or injure another; Knowingly and unlawfully possessing a firearm, that is, a combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device into a destructive device, specifically, a pipe bomb, which was not registered to Worman in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record; Transporting and attempting to transport in interstate commerce an explosive device, that is, a pipe bomb, with knowledge that the explosive would be used to kill, injure, or intimidate a person, or to unlawfully damage or destroy a building, vehicle, or other real or personal property; Knowingly (a) using a destructive device, that is, a pipe bomb, during and in relation to a crime of violence, including the crimes charged in Counts 1 and 3: and (b) possessing a destructive device, that is, a pipe bomb, in furtherance of a crime of violence)
10/07/2008U.S. v. Charles Schrage (Having previously been convicted of one or more crimes punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, defendant knowingly possessed, in and affecting commerce, one or more of the following firearms and ammunition: (1) a Winchester Model 88, .243 caliber lever action rifle with serial number H254499; (2) a Remington Model 1100, 12-gauge shotgun with serial number M114860M; (3) a Harrington and Richardson Model SB2 Ultra, .223 caliber single shot rifle with serial number HG325500; (4) a Ruger M77, .22 x 250 caliber rifle with serial number 73-19955; (5) a High Standard, .22 caliber revolver with serial number 001925 (W-106); and (6) various rounds of ammunition.)
09/24/2008U.S. v. Eder Noe Sosa-Jimenez (Knowingly and unlawfully conspiring to commit one or more of the following offenses:
(a) distributing 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, which contained 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine;
(b) possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, which contained 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine;
(c) employing, hiring, using, persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing a person under eighteen years of age to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; and
(d) employing, hiring, using, persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing a person under eighteen years of age to possess with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.

Knowingly and intentionally distributing a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.


Knowingly and intentionally employing, hiring, using, persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing a person under eighteen years of age, to distribute and to aid and abet another to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.

Knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute and aiding and abetting another to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, which contained 5 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine.
09/02/2008U.S. v. Phieu Van Nguyen (Forfeiture)
08/27/2008U.S. v. Phieu Van Nguyen & Va Thi Nguyen
(As to Phieu Nguyen:

Knowingly, and intentionally engaging in a “continuing criminal enterprise” or “CCE” in that he knowingly and intentionally committed the following continuing series of felony violations of federal law:
(a) manufacturing marijuana;
(b) distributing marijuana;
(c) possessing with intent to distribute marijuana;
(d) using a communications facility to facilitate the commission of felony drug-trafficking offenses;
(e) using a structure for the purpose of manufacturing controlled substances; and
(f) conspiring to manufacture, distribute, and possess with intent to distribute marijuana

Undertaking this continuing series of violations in concert with at least five other persons with respect to whom he occupied a position of organizer, supervisor, and any position of management, and that he obtained substantial income and resources from this continuing series of violations.

Knowingly and willfully conducting, attempting to conduct, and aiding and abetting in the conduct of financial transactions affecting interstate and foreign commerce that involved the proceeds of illegal drug trafficking, and that he did so
(a) with the intent to promote the carrying on of the illegal drug trafficking;
(b) knowing the transaction was designed in whole or in part to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of the illegal drug trafficking; and
(c) knowing the transaction was designed in whole and in part to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under federal law.

While conducting, attempting to conduct, and aiding and abetting another to conduct such financial transactions, defendant knew that the property involved in the financial transactions represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity.

Knowingly engaging in and attempting to engage in monetary transactions through or to a financial institution, affecting interstate or foreign commerce, in criminally derived property of a value greater than $10,000, such property having been derived from illegal drug trafficking.

As to Va Thi Nguyen:

Knowingly and unlawfully conspiring with others to commit the following offenses:
(a) manufacturing 1,000 or more marijuana plants;
(b) possessing with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana; and
(c) distributing 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana.

Conspiring to commit these offenses within 1,000 feet of a playground or school)
08/05/2008U.S. v. Tarone M. Jones ( Having previously been convicted of one or more crimes punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, knowingly possessing, in and affecting commerce, firearms)
07/28/2008U.S. v. Kuothbang Yuot & Gokgok Puok ( Knowingly and intentionally conspiring with each other and with others, to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine; Knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute 5 grams or more of crack cocaine; Knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute and distributed an unspecified amount of crack cocaine; Knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute and distributing an unspecified amount of crack cocaine.
07/24/2008U.S. v. Jose Juan Islas-Bravo (Knowingly and intentionally conspiring with others, to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture of substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; Knowingly and unlawfully possessing with intent to distribute and aiding and abetting another to possess with intent to distribute approximately 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, which contained 5 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine.)
07/24/2008U.S. v. Jose Juan Islas-Bravo (supplemental instruction)
04/23/2008U.S. v. Benjamin Thomas (Knowingly possessing, in and affecting commerce, six rounds of .44 caliber ammunition and a firearm, having previously been convicted of one or more crimes punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.
04/04/2008U.S. v. Tracy Brunken (Knowingly and intentionally conspiring with others to commit two offenses: (1) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; and (2) distribution of 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine; Knowingly and intentionally possessing, with intent to distribute, a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.
03/05/2008United States v. Michael Ingram (Conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine)
02/22/2008U.S. v. Leodan Vasquez (Conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine/unlawful possession with intent to distriubute and aided and abetted another to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine)
01/29/2008U.S. v. Donald Smith (felon in possession)
11/14/2007U.S. v. Laurie Binjamun (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine)
10/19/2007U.S. v. Lee Marvin Bell & Kenyatta Draine
10/04/2007U.S. v. Donisi (Forfeiture Instructions)
10/03/2007U.S. v. Donisi (Merit Instructions -- Defendant knowingly and unlawfully manufactured and attempted to manufacture 100 or more plants of marijuana; Defendant knowingly and unlawfully conspired with other persons, to commit the following four offenses or “objectives”: (1) to manufacture 100 or more marijuana plants; (2) to manufacture 100 kilograms or more of marijuana; (3) to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana; and (4) to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana; Defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute mixtures or substances containing a detectable amount of nandrolone and stanozolol, which are anabolic steroids; Defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of oxycodone, which is a narcotic similar to morphine that is properly used, only by prescription, for the management of pain; Defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of marijuana; Defendant, who was then an unlawful user of controlled substances, specifically, marijuana, anabolic steroids, and oxycodone, did knowingly possess one or more firearms, in and affecting commerce; Defendant knowingly and unlawfully conspired with other persons, whose names are known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit the following offenses or “objectives”: (1) to conduct financial transactions knowing that the property involved represented proceeds of some form of unlawful activity with intent to promote the carrying on of that unlawful activity (the “promotion” objective); and (2) to conduct financial transactions knowing that the property involved represented proceeds of some form of unlawful activity knowing that the transaction was designed, in whole or in part, to conceal the proceeds of the unlawful activity)
08/20/2007U.S. v. Troy Nowlen (Knowingly and intentionally conspiring o commit the following offenses: (1) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; and (2) distribution of 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine.)
07/30/2007U.S. v. Rahmaan Manzar El Herman (Knowingly conspiring with others to commit the following offenses: (1) manufacturing 50 grams or more of cocaine base, which is commonly called “crack cocaine”; (2) distributing 50 grams or more of cocaine base, which is commonly called “crack cocaine”; and (3) distributing 500 grams or more of cocaine salt, which is commonly called “powder cocaine.”
06/06/2007U.S. v. Todd Becker (Defendant knowingly conspired with other persons to commit either or both of the following offenses: (1) distribution of 5 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of the real property comprising a school; and (2) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of the real property comprising a school. , Iowa;
Defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed, with intent to distribute, a mixture or substance that contained five grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of the real property comprising a school.)
06/06/2007U.S. v. Todd Becker (Supplemental Instruction on quantity of controlled substances)
05/25/2007U.S. v. Lee, et al. (All three defendants in this matter plead prior to a verdict in this case.
Defendants knowingly conspired with each other and with other persons to commit either or both of the following offenses: (1) manufacturing 50 grams or more of crack cocaine; and (2) distributing 50 grams or more of crack cocaine; Defendant Antione Diandre Maxwell possessed with intent to distribute, 4.12 grams of crack cocaine; Defendant Orondee Jacquell Maxwell possessed or aided and abettied another to possess, with intent to distribute, approximately 2.22 grams of crack cocaine; Defendant Eddie Jermane Lee possessed or aided and abetted another to possess, with intent to distribute, approximately 1 gram of crack cocaine; Defendant Eddie Jermane Lee possessed or aided and abetted another to possess, with intent to distribute, 1.32 grams of crack cocaine; Defendant Orondee Jacquell Maxwell distributed or aided and abetted another to distribute, approximately .65 grams of crack cocaine; defendant Orondee Jacquell Maxwell distributed or aided and abetted another to distribute, approximately .68 grams of crack cocaine. )
05/25/2007U.S. v. Lee, et al. (All three defendants in this matter plead. Supplemental instruction on spoilation of evidence.)
05/08/2007U.S. v. Justin Cole (Defendant knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base, commonly known as crack cocaine;
Knowingly and intentionally possessing an unspecified quantity of marijuana; Doing either or both of the following:
(a) knowingly opening and maintaining the residence at 531 Sherman Avenue, Waterloo, Iowa, for the purpose of distributing and using controlled substances, including cocaine base, commonly known as crack cocaine, and marijuana, and
(b) managing and controlling the residence at 531 Sherman Avenue, Waterloo, Iowa, as a lessee, and knowingly and intentionally making the residence available for use, with or without compensation, for the purpose of unlawfully storing, distributing, or using controlled substances, including cocaine base, commonly known as crack cocaine, and marijuana.)
04/12/2007U.S. v. Enrique Aragon-Hernandez & Eduardo Tejeda-Cadena (Defendants knowingly conspired to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; Defendants knowingly and intentionally distributed or aided and abetted another in the distribution of 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; defendant Aragon-Hernandez possessed a firearm in furtherance of the drug-trafficking conspiracy offense)
04/04/2007U.S. v. Thomas Huntley (Knowingly and intentionally distributing a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; Knowingly using a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking crime)
03/05/2007U.S. v. Alberto Villalpando (Knowingly and unlawfully conspiring with others to commit one or more of the following separate offenses: (1) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; (2) distribution of 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine; and (3) distribution of an unspecified quantity of cocaine salt, which is commonly called “powder cocaine.”;Knowingly and intentionally distributin g 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine.
02/22/2007U.S. v. David Nieman (Defendant knowingly and unlawfully conspired with other persons to distribute methamphetamine; defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed, with intent to distribute actual (pure) methamphetamine; defendant then being an unlawful user of methamphetamine, knowingly possessed one or more firearms in and affecting interstate commerce; defendant knowingly possessed one or more firearms in furtherance of the drug-trafficking crimes; defendant knowingly and unlawfully conspired with other persons, to conduct and to attempt to conduct financial transactions that involved proceeds of distributing and possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine with the intent to promote the carrying on of that unlawful activity, knowing that the property involved in the financial transactions represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity.)
01/02/2007U.S. v. Dillard Tolbert (Defendant knowingly and unlawfully possessed, with intent to distribute, 50 grams or more of cocaine base, which is commonly called “crack cocaine.)
11/28/2006U.S. v. Emmanuel Herron (Knowingly and unlawfully conspiring with other persons, to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine.
Possession of a firearm, in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime for which defendant may be prosecuted in a court of the United States
11/13/2006U.S. v. Ryan Mathison, Robert Mathison, Sr. and Ronald Mathison (Defendant Ryan Keith Mathison knowingly, intentionally, and unlawfully engaged in a “continuing criminal enterprise” or “CCE.” The CCE allegedly involved this defendant committing a series of felony violations by violating one or more of the following federal controlled substances laws: (a) distributing marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, and anabolic steroids; (b) possessing with intent to distribute of marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, and anabolic steroids; (c) conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, and anabolic steroids; (d) using a communications facility to facilitate the commission of felony drug-trafficking offenses; and (e) using a structure for the purpose of distributing controlled substances. Defendant Ryan Keith Mathison undertook this series of violations in concert with at least five other persons with respect to whom he occupied a position of organizer, supervisor, or any position of management, and that he allegedly obtained from this series of violations substantial income and resources.
Defendants Ryan Keith Mathison, and Robert Mathison, Sr., knowingly and unlawfully conspired, with each other and with others to commit the following offenses: (1) distributing one thousand kilograms or more of marijuana, and unspecified quantities of cocaine, methamphetamine, and anabolic steroids; and (2) possessing with intent to distribute one thousand kilograms or more of marijuana, and unspecified quantities of cocaine, methamphetamine, and anabolic steroids. Between about 2001 and May 2006, defendants Ryan Keith Mathison, Robert Mathison, Sr., and Ronald Mathison knowingly and unlawfully conspired, with each other and with others to commit the following offenses: (1) conducting and attempting to conduct financial transactions involving the proceeds of drug-trafficking activity knowing that the transactions were to promote the carrying on of drug-trafficking activity; and (b) conducting and attempting to conduct financial transactions involving the proceeds of drug-trafficking activity knowing that the transactions were designed to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of drug-trafficking activity. For a specified tax year, defendant Ryan Keith Mathison willfully made and subscribed a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, which was verified by a written declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury and was filed with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which said Income Tax Return he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter in that the said return failed to disclose that he was engaged in the illegal trafficking in controlled substances from which he derived gross receipts, gross income, or sales, whereas, as he then and there well knew and believed, he was required by law and regulation to disclose the operation of this business activity and the gross receipts, gross income, or sales he derived therefrom.
09/08/2006U.S. v. Vincent & Karl Bertling (unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly conspiringwith other persons, to corruptly endeavor to influence, obstruct, and impede the due administration of justice, by murdering or otherwise intimidating witnesses; being an unlawful user of controlled substances, knowingly possessing, in and affecting commerce, a firearm; being an unlawful user of controlled substances, knowingly possessing, in and affecting commerce, ammunition
08/02/2006U.S. v. Tim Roberson (Knowingly and unlawfully conspiring with other persons, o commit one or more of the following offenses: (1) manufacturing 50 grams or more of cocaine base, which is commonly called “crack cocaine”; (2) distributing 50 grams or more of cocaine base, which is commonly called “crack cocaine”; (3) distributing 500 grams or more of cocaine salt, which is commonly called “powder cocaine”; and (4) distributing a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of marijuana.)
07/25/2006U.S. v. Gustavo Degadillo-Miranda & Nancy Martin (defendants knowingly and unlawfully conspired with other persons, to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute in excess of one hundred kilograms of marijuana.)
06/28/2006U.S. v. Robert Lee Williams (Knowingly and unlawfully conspiring with others to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base, which is commonly called “crack cocaine; knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute 23.74 grams of cocaine base; knowingly and intentionally distributing .44 grams of cocaine base; knowingly and intentionally distributing 1.1 grams of cocaine base; possessing a firearm in furtherance of either or both of the drug-trafficking crimes charged; having previously been convicted of a felony drug offense, knowingly possessing, in and affecting commerce)
04/11/2006U.S. v. Mario Rosas (Conspiracy to manufacture and distribute 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine and possession of one or more firearms in furtherance of the drug conspiracy)
09/20/2005U.S. v. Steven Spears (Knowingly and unlawfully conspiring with other persons to commit two separate offenses: (1) distributing 50 grams or more of cocaine base, commonly called “crack cocaine,” and (2) distributing 500 grams or more of cocaine salt, commonly called “powder cocaine.”)
08/17/2005U.S. v Jesse John Wendelsdorf (Knowingly and unlawfully conspired with others to commit the following 4 offenses: (1) knowingly renting, using and maintaining a residence for the purpose of using, distributing, and manufacturing controlled substances (2) managing and controlling a residence as the lessee, agen and occupant, and knowingly and intentionally making the property available for the purpose of unlawfully using, distributing, and manufacturing meth and marijuana (3) distributing 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing meth and (4) posessing, ith intent to distribute, 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing meth)
02/18/2005U.S. v. Raul Padilla Morales Conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of a public playground.)
02/16/2005U.S. v. Lance Duane Messerly (Being an unlawful user of marijuana and cocaine, knowingly and unlawfully possessed one or more firearms; Being an unlawful user of marijuana and cocaine, knowingly and unlawfully possessed blasting caps; Being an unlawful user of marijuana, knowingly and unlawfully possessed one or more rounds of ammunition.
02/03/2005U.S. v. Freddie Arroyo-Santiago (Conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of a public playground)
12/14/2004U.S. v. Joel Edward Smith (Knowingly and unlawfully conspired with other persons, to manufacture and distribute 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine and to manufacture and distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.)
10/21/2004U.S. v. Honken (Death penalty phase instructions)
09/08/2004U.S. v. Honken (Death Penalty Trial -- The alleged murder of five witnesses to the defendant’s drug-trafficking or other alleged criminal conduct, the solicitation of murder of other witnesses, and conspiracy to tamper with witnesses and to solicit the murder of witnesses.
08/04/2004U.S. v. Tanner McLean (On or about April 15, 2004, Mr. McLean possessed a .22 caliber (long rifle) Ruger Woodsmen Mark I automatic pistol, serial number 10-14666, having previously been convicted of a felony offense.)
07/28/2004U.S. v. Timothy Vaudt (Knowingly and unlawfully conspired with other persons, to commit either or both of the following separate drug-trafficking offenses:
(1) the manufacture of 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine; and
(2) the distribution of 50 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of a public playground; Used or carried a firearm during and in relation to the conspiracy charged in Count 1.)
03/23/2004U.S. v. Lorna Agius (Knowingly and intentionally aiding and abetting David Van Osten’s failure to appear on October 6, 2003, before a federal magistrate judge in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for a change of plea hearing.
02/11/2004U.S. v. Betterton (Knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute 69.18 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, which contained 6.9518 grams of actual (pure) methamphetamine; knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute approximately 179.30 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine; knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute approximately 110.81 grams of marijuana.
12/11/2003U.S. v. Joel Ameling & Tina Brown (Conspiracy commit either or both of the following offenses: (1) manufacturing 5 grams or more of actual (“pure”) methamphetamine; and (2) possessing 5 grams or more of actual (“pure”) methamphetamine with intent to distribute it. Count 1 is the only charge against defendant Brown, although defendant Ameling is charged with five other count; Knowingly and intentionally possessed approximately 8 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine (a methamphetamine mixture) with intent to distribute it; Knowingly and intentionally manufactured or attempted to manufacture 5 grams or more of actual (“pure”) methamphetamine; Knowingly and unlawfully opened or maintained a place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, and using a controlled substance, specifically, methamphetamine. The prosecution identifies the “place” or “drug establishment” as 1321 255th Avenue, Fort Atkinson, Iowa; Unlawful user of methamphetamine, knowingly possessed one or more firearms in and affecting commerce; Possessed one or more firearms in furtherance of one or more of the drug-trafficking offenses charged in Counts 1 (conspiracy), 3 (manufacturing methamphetamine), and 4 (maintaining a drug establishment). --- the court dismissed count one of the indictment on defendants' Rule 29 motion, thus eliminating defndant Brown from the case)
11/19/2003US v. Vieth ( Between about the spring of 2000 and September 2000, defendant conspired and agreed with others to commit either or both of the following offenses: (1) manufacturing or distributing 5 grams or more of “pure” methamphetamine; and (2) manufacturing or distributing 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine;
On or about September 17, 2000,defendant knowingly and intentionally manufactured, attempted to manufacture, or aided and abetted an attempt to manufacture 5 grams or more of “pure” methamphetamine.
On or about September 17, 2000, Mr. Vieth knowingly and intentionally possessed a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it.)
11/19/2003U.S. v. Vesey Knowingly and unlawfully distributed more than 5 grams of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base, more commonly called "crack cocaine.")
10/21/2003US v. Mann (Prosecution for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine with lesser included offense of possession of methamphetamine.)
09/23/2003U.S. v. Thomas Miller (Knowingly and intentionally manufactured and attempted to manufacture 5 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of a school.)
08/27/2003U.S. v. Santiago Valdivia-Perez (Conspiracy to distribute controlled substances; and using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking crime.)
07/29/2003U.S. v. Perera ("witness tampering"; More specifically, knowingly attempted to intimidate and threaten, and did intimidate and threaten, Paul McKenzie by calling him a "snitch" and telling McKenzie that McKenzie and McKenzie’s children had better "watch their backs," or words to that effect, with the intent to influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of Paul McKenzie in the criminal trial of United States v. James Edward Clay in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Case No. CR00-4004)
06/16/2003U.S. v. Tracy Smoley (Knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed with other persons, known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit the following offenses:
(1) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; and
(2) distribution of marijuana.
06/10/2003U.S. v. David Wingrove (Knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed with other persons, known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit the following offenses within 1,000 feet of a school:
(1) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine;
(2) possession, with intent to distribute, of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine;
(3) distribution of marijuana; and
(4) possession, with intent to distribute, of marijuana.)
06/04/2003U.S. v. Nikki Nieman (Knowingly executed or attempted to execute a scheme to defraud Firstar, a financial institution whose accounts were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
04/01/2003U.S. v. Bern (Knowingly and unlawfully conspired and agreed with other persons to commit either or both of the following drug-trafficking offenses: (1) the distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; and (2) the manufacture of 5 grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine.)
02/21/2003U.S. v. Anthony Smith (Knowingly and intentionally manufactured or attempted to manufacture five grams or more of actual (pure) methamphetamine; after having been convicted of a felony offense, knowingly possesing one Jennings .380 caliber pistol)
02/05/2003U.S. v. Rodriguez (Conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine. More specifically, between about January 2000, and continuing through and including August 2002, Mr. Rodriguez knowingly and unlawfully combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed with other persons, known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit either or both of the following separate offenses: (1) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; and (2) distribution of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine.)
01/21/2003U.S. v. David Hirsch (Perjury in a jury trial in which defendant had been charged with certain firearm offenses; the indictment charges that, in his testimony in that trial, defendant knowingly made false statements about how long a vehicle belonging to him had been on the property of another and unable to run, which the government contends were material to charges that defendant had unlawfully possessed a firearm that law enforcement officers had found in that vehicle.]
01/14/2003U.S. v. Arreola & Bustos (Knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.
10/23/2002U.S. v. Rosario Placensia (Conspiracy to commit offenses involving the distribution of methamphetamine; between about 1997, and continuing through and including January 18, 2002, Mr. Placensia knowingly and unlawfully combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed with other persons, known and unknown to commit either or both of the following separate offenses: (1) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; and (2) distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of the real property comprising a playground or schoolyard.
10/09/2002U.S. v. Todd Mansker (Conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. More specifically; knowingly and unlawfully combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed with other persons, known and unknown to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.)
09/07/2002U.S. v. Robert Lee Pate (Conspiracy to commit drug-trafficking offenses. More specifically, between about January 1996, through and including June 2000, Mr. Pate knowingly and unlawfully combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed with other persons, known and unknown to commit two separate offenses: (1) distribution of 50 grams or more of cocaine based, commonly called "crack cocaine"; and (2) possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base, commonly known as "crack cocaine.")
07/09/2002U.S. v. Williams (Knowingly and intentionally distributing approximately 1.42 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base, commonly known as "crack cocaine."
03/29/2002U.S. v. David Hirsch (Defendant, then being an unlawful user of controlled substances, knowingly possessed one loaded Lorcin .380 caliber handgun, serial number 326812, in and affecting interstate commerce.
Defendant
possessed a firearm in furtherance of a drug offense.
02/05/2002 U.S. v. John Wilson (Knowingly and fraudulently concealed and caused to be concealed from creditors and from the United States Trustee property belonging to his bankruptcy estate consisting of the following: (1) all or part of approximately $55,000 in proceeds from the settlement of a lawsuit; (2) approximately $35,000 in wire transfer proceeds; and (3) income earned between May 30, 1995, and May ; knowingly and fraudulently made false material statements under oath in and in relation to his bankruptcy proceeding by falsely testifying under oath in a proceeding before the case trustee at a meeting of creditors that he lost approximately $55,000 in proceeds from his lawsuit in a real estate transaction; knowingly and fraudulently made false declarations, certificates, verifications, and statements under penalty of perjury, as permitted in relation to bankruptcy proceedings, when he made fraudulent statements on his Statement of Financial Affairs and Schedules of Assets, and other written statements;
after filing his bankruptcy case, knowingly and fraudulently concealed and falsified recorded information relating to his property and financial affairs.)
01/17/2002U.S. v. Karl Kessler & Adele Hylback (Conspiracy to commit (from between January 2000 through May 2000) either or both of the following offenses: (a) manufacturing or distributing 5 grams or more of methamphetamine, or (b) manufacturing or distributing 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine;knowingly and intentionally manufactured, attempted to manufacture, or aided and abetted an attempt to manufacture 5 grams or more of methamphetamine; conspiracy to commit (during about March 2001 either or both of the following offenses: (a) manufacturing or distributing 5 grams or more of methamphetamine, or (b) manufacturing or distributing 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine;On or about March 30, 2001, knowingly and intentionally manufactured, attempted to manufacture, or aided and abetted an attempt to manufacture 5 grams or more of methamphetamine; unlawful user of controlled substances, knowingly possessed certain firearms.
01/04/2002U.S. v. My Linh Nguyen (Conspiracy to commit one or more of the following offenses: (a) distribution of approximately 49 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base, also known as "crack cocaine"; and (b) possession with intent to distribute of approximately 49 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of crack cocaine; knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute and aiding and abetting the distribution and possession with intent to distribute of 49 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of crack cocaine.)
12/19/2001U.S. v. Alexandro Vasquez-Gutierrez (Knowingly and intentionally possessing more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute it.)
12/13/2001U.S. v. Roberto Alvarez-Delgadillo (Conspiracy to commit: (1) distribution of 500 grams or more of methamphetamine; and (2) possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute over 500 grams of methamphetamine)
12/11/2001U.S. v. Roxann Harlan (retention of moneys, funds, and credits in excess of $1,000, belonging to the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska and Iowa, an Indian tribal organization, knowing them to have been willfully misapplied to her own acount, with intent to convert them to her own use.)
11/09/2001U.S. v. Montreail Dungy (Conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine, to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine, and to manufacture or attempt to manufacture crack cocaine (Count one); Possession with intent to distribute powder cocaine (Count two) and, Possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine)
10/12/2001U.S. v. Carlos Rada (Acquittal on charges of possession with intent to distribute controlled substances and conspiracy to distribute or to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances)
07/26/2001U.S. v. McDonald (knowingly and unlawfully possessing 24 grams of cocaine base, "crack cocaine" with intent to distribute; knowingly and unlawfully possessing 105 grams of cocaine salt, "cocaine powder", with intent to distribute)
05/22/2001U.S. v. Regenwether (inducing another to attempt to rob a bank; soliciting or endeavoring to persuade another to commit a violent felony; inducing another to rob a bank; and conspiring with others to rob one or more of three banks)
05/02/2001U.S. v. Harp (this case never got to a jury because the defendant pled on the second day of trial; defendant was charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it within 1,000 feet of a public playground; distribution of methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of public playground; and using or carrying a firemarm during and in relation to one or more drug trafficking offenses;)
04/06/2001U.S. v. Vasquez-Gutierrez (knowingly and intentionally possessed more tha five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribut it)
03/27/2001U.S. v. Carpenter (knowingly and intentionally possessed over 50 grams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it)
03/24/2001U.S. v. Schneider (conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of methampetamine and to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine.)
02/06/2001U.S. v. Campos (knowingly and intentionally possessed 50 grams or more of methamphetamine with intent to distribute)
12/08/2000U.S. v. Peterson (making false statements to a licensed dealer in connection with the acquisition or attempted acquisition of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6))
12/05/2000U.S. v. Wilcke (conspiracy to manufacture and possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute it, possession of a firearm by an unlawful user of a controlled substance)
11/13/2000U.S. v. Luna (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine; using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug conspiracy)
11/02/2000U.S. v. Huerta-Orozco (knowingly and intentionally possessed, or aided and abetted the possession of, 500 grams or more of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it)
10/05/2000U.S. v. Ortega, Castro & Polmanteer (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and possessoin of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute)
06/15/2000U.S. v. Martinez-Rocha (distribution of methamphetamine; aiding and abetting the distribution of methamphetamine; possession of methamphetamine; and aiding and abetting the possession of methamphetamine
06/14/2000U.S. v. Treadway (bank robbery by assault with a dangerous weapon; knowingly using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence)
06/02/2000U.S. v. Ung & Le (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine within 1000 feet of a "schoolyard"; distribution or aiding and abetting the distribution of methamphetamine wihin 1000 feet of a "schoolyard"
05/26/2000U.S. v. Nguyen (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it)
01/06/2000U.S. v. Johnson (distribution of crack cocaine; possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute)
12/01/1999U.S. v. Hilliard (aiding and abetting the illegal transfer of firearms; conspiracy to commit the illegal transfer of firearms)
09/22/1999U.S. v. Jermaine Harris (distribution of cocaine; possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it; conspiracy to commit drug offenses)
08/04/1999U.S. v. Foster (conspiracy to commit drug offenses)
06/30/1999US v. Molina (distribution of methamphetamine and using a communications facility to cause, commit, or facilitate distribution of methamphetamine
06/11/1999US v. Causor-Serrato (conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine)
02/26/1999US v. O'Dell (conspiracy to commit money laundering; money laundering; conspiracy to violate drug laws)
02/11/1999US v. Kaune (conspiracy to transport stolen motorcycles in interstate commerce; making a false declaration to a grand jury; making a false statement to an investigator)
12/02/1998US v. Zavala-Vega (Distribution of methamphetamine; possession with intent to distribte; aiding and abetting)
07/30/1998US v. Astello, Kozak & Ortiz (kidnapping; conspiracy to kidnap; using or carrying a firearm; aiding and abetting; and co-conspirator liability)
05/07/1998US v. Moore, Ira (conspiracy to commit bank robbery; attempted bank robbery; transportation of a stolen vehicle across state lines)
03/04/1998US v. Moore, Ben (possession with intent to distribute cocaine base; possession of cocaine base; felon in possession of a firearm)
01/28/1998US v. Smith, Vincent (felon in possession of a firearm)
12/11/1997US v. Junkman (conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, cocaine, and marijuana; possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine)
10/29/1997US v. Guel (accessory after the fact to possession with intent to distribute amphetamine; conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and amphetamine)
06/12/1997US v. Hildebrand (finals) (conspiracy to commit mail fraud; mail fraud; conspiracy to commit money laundering; forfeiture)
06/12/1997US v. Hildebrand (forfeiture) (conspiracy to commit mail fraud; mail fraud; conspiracy to commit money laundering; forfeiture)
06/12/1997US v. Hildebrand (prelims) (conspiracy to commit mail fraud; mail fraud; conspiracy to commit money laundering; forfeiture)






---hidden fields---